Researchers:

Intelligence love Revolution is an upcoming educational program in foreign Objekt. At this stage we are starting with opportunity to present at an online conference at the Kherson National Technical University to conduct the group based the Methodological Collectives. At this stage, we are ((((process about Intelligence-Love-Revolution through the Creative/Critical analysis of a case study. (edited)

 

The initial group is based on the collective methodologies of local political / social formations that allow transformations or alterations at the level of global structures. There are two main questions: What are the transformative powers of local formations? Moreover, what are Transformative Formations?

 

The transformative power of local formations, in tandem with global transformations, indeed requires a construct of methodological collectivism—as opposed to methodological individualism, which presupposes a local modality of dialectic in which each local transformation accompanies the other but with no opportunity for integration, synthesis. In a sense, today's models lack the integration between methodological collectivism, hegemony-building, and individual liberty.

 

The global structures are not capitalistic by nature. Totality is a metaphysical idea. From the totality of the monstrous global construct comes the rigid correlation between the functions of capitalism and its structural bases (States). Since the "correlation" determines the founding gesture for interrogation of the general or universal structure, we begin by looking at(this part can be anything, I just thought maybe this can relate to the question of conditions of possibility, for example the condition of possibility is itself the limit to transformation because it is made based on the divide( which is also needed to construct, since we still have the discontinuity between the levels) or structural stability within a certain range, but, the problem is that, when we are calling the conditions of possibility we forget that we are throwing a limit, in kantian or Aristotle sense between the physics and mathematics. Or mathematics and logic. So this  condition leads to the possibility of the sperate, the abstract, determined but we cannot graph this abstraction back into the mobile nature. The immobile  is still metaphysical, and its limitation, although it is necessary, deals with the impoverishment and limitation of the determined structure (or existence). 

 

 a philosophical models with regards to the relations between non-being and being. Then, by analyzing the mathematical/logical constitution of these models will look into the relation between mathematics and logic within these models and show that the problems with early metaphysical models are still unresolved. They are shape-shifting through our scientific as well as socio-political systems. By editing at the surface level, we are falling into the trap of the liberal perspective. Not everything can be fixed.

 

 

Our  future models needs to look at ethics as a methodology, so here we are  accessing the metaphorical, computational and mathematical structures of metaphysics.  and spatio-temporal models, as we are descending into underworld with Socrates to meet diatoma, in the Allegory of …, and the Outside Views  are examples of this the very basic philosophical models, which we are constructing.